Criticizing Photographs By Terry Barrett (Page 78-91)
In this section of Criticizing Photographs, Terry Barrett
defines two more of the photographic categories: interpretive photographs, and
ethically evaluative photographs. He defines interpretive photographs as photos
that explain how things are, with the photographer finding personal and
subjective interpretations. This makes interpretive photos different from
explanatory ones, as they do not have to be scientifically accurate or prove a
factual point. They are artistic interpretations where the photographer makes
all of the specific choices. They give you an eye into the photographers mind
and make you interpret their specific meaning.
Ethically evaluative photos are
focused on creating thought or discussion about aspects of society. Many
photographers choose to focus on topics such as war, disease, poverty or race.
This makes this category of photographs very interesting and thought provoking.
They literally make you evaluate the ethical issues that they are touching
upon.
I found both of these categories
very interesting, with interpretive photographs being very artistic while
ethically evaluative ones are very hard-hitting. The text also gave many different
examples of each category which all seemed very interesting. I don’t think I
really realized how much you can do with photography or how many things are
considered photography. Even advertisements are considered ethically evaluative
photographs as they do make a statement about an issue in society. This really solidified
the idea that photography is an art as it is an interpretation of what the
photographer wants you to see.
Comments
Post a Comment